I have received some emails lately from people asking if I wrote for UFO Magazine in the past. Yes I did. Though not officially on staff at the magazine, I did have several published pieces in the magazine. Many of them were book reviews. Yes, I am
an avid reader of books on the subject of UFOs and have been for many years. Why? I shall get into detail on that some time later; but I was ordered, on a few occasions in the military, to forget about something I (and on some occasions others) saw.
As
for the articles I wrote, published between say 2002 to around 2007 (in just about every issue, prior to going to an online format), I was noted by readers for taking on subjects in a very blunt manner. If I found something to be a complete fabrication, I
wrote it out as such. If something was interesting or groundbreaking, I wrote about that. If I found something to be nothing other than a drug induced hallucination, I made that very clear. The last one did not earn me many friends. Such as many people claiming
to see UFOs hovering over a certain type of concert--music where the indulging in ganja is central to the experience--and alien creatures wandering among the crowd and so on. As matter of fact, there was much hate mail about this topic. Yet, when
I wrote about the book HEAVENLY LIGHTS (2005 Fernandes) which covered events at Fatima, Portugal--where thousands witnessed an event-with photgraphic evidence--and the emails were divided into half hate and half praise. The haters claiming it was a massive,
and identical, hallucination by thousands of religious fanatics. Go figure.
So yes, you will find little tid-bits of me out in the cyber world or on paper. There is a review for UFOs OVER CALIFORNIA that is sent my way every now and again. Yes, that
is mine; read the book and enjoy.
About the subject of UFO's in general, many have tried to ridicule me about the subject; and from across a wide variety of beliefs. Ultra liberal, super conservative, the very devoutly religeous to those who belive
in nothing at all- many have repeated the empty proclomations spewed out by the yammering rectangle in their living room. You know that box, it might hang on a wall and tell you: how to vote, how many men Kris Jenner slept with this week, and that you can
keep your Doctor-health plan and $2,500 a year and so on. Yes, the television which has all of the important news and events spewing from it all day long. The so-called news talks about global warming, and there was snow in Southern California just 2 days
ago; maybe Solyndra has something to do with that. Anyway, I answer the ridiculers with questions like this:
If a Federal agency of the United States issued a memo that speaks of recovered or captured discs (flying saucers) in the past tense and a need
to examine them--and the memo is signed (therefore authored/cleared by) the head of the agency, might that be proof?
If there was internal memoranda from aerospace companies discussing the performance characteristics and physical properties of such
vehicles, would that point to proof?
If there were ranking scientists in the space program who flatly stated that we (humans) received technological help from alien beings, would that serve as proof?
If the head of the a prominent aerospace corporation
stated that humans are in possesion of alien vehicles, would that be proof?
Let us pretend a government scientist came forward and discussed things like alien vehicles and elements not yet on the periodic table--not for 15 or more years--might that
be a hint at something?
Typically, not always, but typically, these people who bother to ridicule are not the kind to burn half a calorie listening or thinking. They drift off to important subjects like Miley Cyrus' piercings
or the need for recognition of the stunted grub worm of Moldavia by the United Nations as a protected species.
(Answers to the above questions:
J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI,
McDonnel Douglas/Boeing,
Dr. Oberth, and
Dr. Werner von Braun-as he told Esotera magazine in an interview,
Ben Rich who was the head of Lockheed/Skunkworks spoke about aliens and their vehicles
and fianlly Bob Lazar, scientist and engineer who blew the cover off of Area 51, reverse
engineering alien vehicles and spoke of element 115 in 1989---the element itself was not so much as a theory until 2004---a 15 year lapse but the scientist who spoke of alien vehicles in the hands of US scientists and the properties of a yet undiscovered
element are some how not worthy of mention of the popular news media.
These might be considered as proof. Or you can catch up on JERSEY SHORE reruns.)